★ Reviews ★

Let customers speak for us

756 reviews
Marshall McCutchen (Tulsa, US)
It's good.

I enjoy this. It's where I ended up after trying several different brands and flavors shortly after Volcano inexplicably turned thier Tobacco Pure flavor into a sented candle like flavor.

Juan Hernandez (Vallejo, US)
I like it

volcano e cigs changed the formula for their pure tobacco juice after vaping it for 9 years. switched to this and I like it so far.

Vanilla Kretek
Mike (Johnson City, US)
Great throwback to Djarums!

As a longtime smoker of Djarum Black Vanillas (or Ivory as they're now called), this is the perfect juice to satisfy that craving, and is helping me eliminate my smoking habit. I have tried several clove-flavored juices and this is the only one I would purchase again. I don't vape clove juice all the time, but when I do, it's Vanilla Kretek by Rasta Vapors :)

Jack Frost
STACEY P (Brooklyn, US)
Cool sweet minty flavor ❄️

I found this flavor to be really refreshing and I like the balance of sweet mint and menthol!

Vanilla Kretek
Cathrine Baird
Yearning for clove

I loved clove cigarettes when I smoked. Then they couldn’t be sold anymore. I resorted to clove cigars ( though they were a bit more harsh) when I quit smoking I found plain tobacco flavors didn’t taste the same as smoking them did.so I turned to my all time fav... clove. I found a clove e liquid that I loved and then it was discontinued. Once more I found a acceptable one. It too eventually was just gone one day. I have bought countless clove e-liquids since then in my quest for a “good” clove flavor.. I have finally found it and this is it. This is a fantastic clove e-liquid, I love it. I was hesitant to order it at first as I have gotten horrible ones in my searching. This time was payout time. You will not be disappointed. This is now my total fav e-juice. A+

New York Court of Appeals: Vaping is NOT part of Clean Air Act

New York State is one of the most liberal states in the Union, but even the home of The Big Apple struggles with the perceived and imagined differences between vaping eliquids and smoking. While vaping activists consider the two practices completely separate with no real connection, the public-at-large seems to equate any long, tubular device that produces a white mist when protruding from the lips to be “harmful to your health.” Luckily, the New York State Court of Appeals is on the side of the vaping community.

According to a recently decided case, The People vs. Thomas, vaping in public is NOT considered a violation of the state's Clean Air Act, otherwise known as the New York State Public Health Law. As court records indicate, Shawn Thomas was charged with public vaping on June 9, 2015. A police officer says that Mr. Thomas was vaping while standing on a platform of the Nevins Street subway station in Brooklyn. Since this is not a designated smoking area, Thomas was charged with a crime.

Of course, Thomas did not go quietly. The police officers state that he shouted a few choice expletives followed by a rather abrupt, “Get the fuck away from me.” Now that’s a guy who takes his vaping practices very seriously. Police Officer Alexande Miroshnyk and a Seargent Eill responded as one might expect. They issued the vaping enthusiast a citation.

Now most people would probably just pay the fine and move on. But not Thomas. He took it to court. And when he didn’t get a “fair and speedy trial,” he and his lawyer moved for immediate dismissal. After the New York Court of Appeals reviews the lawsuit, they not only dismiss the charge. They also explain why.

According to the Clean Air Act, smoking is defined as “the burning of a lighted cigar, cigarette, pipe or any other matter or substance which contains tobacco.”

It’s the last three words of that statement that seem to be causing so much worldwide confusion when discussing the differences between vaping and smoking. In fact, an account of Thomas’ story even made it into the Washington Post. Post journalist Eugene Volokh includes some other compelling court statements that support the Thomas ruling.

“An electronic cigarette neither burns nor contains tobacco. Instead, the use of such a device, which is commonly referred to as ‘vaping,’ involves ‘the inhalation of vapourized e-cigarette liquid consisting of water, nicotine, a base of propylene glycol or vegetable glycerin and occasionally, flavouring.’ This does not fit within the definition of ‘smoking’ under PHL § 1399-o.”

While RastaVapors does not condone Thomas’ actions specifically related to cursing at cops, we do want to give the man kudos for standing up for his rights and the rights of the entire vaping community. But next time, do it with a bit more class, will you?