Loading... Please wait...

Blog

Dr. Farsalinos explains why ‘research’ about vaping and bladder cancer is bogus

Posted by

A recent article posted by the American Urological Association (AUA) just last week claims that vaping can lead to increased risks of bladder cancer, and Dr. Farsalinos is citing the story as completely bogus. However, the attention-grabbing headline of the article did not stop it from going viral across social media within a matter of hours. Farsalinos wants to set the record straight by point out the many, very alarming breaches in standard scientific research protocol from the AUA study.

Konstantinos Farsalinos is a highly-regarded cancer specialist from the Onassis Cardiac Surgery Centre in Athens, Greece. He is so well-known that he has been an invited guest speaker to the European Society of Cardiology Congress in Munich, Germany and where he spoke of e-cigs and their relationship to improved myocardial functions. The cancer doc is also a vocal pro-vaping advocate who encourages his patients to quit smoking by switching to vaping.

Dr. Farsalinos and his views of the AUA report

While Dr. Farsalinos bases his opinions on research conducted in 2016 by the Royal College of Physicians in the UK, he has also conducted several scientific research studies of his own. Farsalinos is no stranger to properly performed scientific research, but he does take great issue with the methodologies of the recent AUA study involving vaping and bladder cancer.

“It is all over the news today that e-cigarette use is associated with bladder cancer. This is an impressive statement that would certainly raise concerns if any such association was really shown in any study. First, this is based just on a conference abstract, not a published study. Second, the abstract did not measure any association between e-cigarette use and bladder cancer. It evaluated chemicals linked with bladder cancer in the urine of 13 e-cigarette users compared 10 non-users as controls. No smokers were recruited for comparison.”

To put this another way, Konstantinos Farsalinos believes that by refusing to include smokers into the sample group of participants, the final conclusions derived from the AUA study are essentially false. In his weekly blog, Farsalinos also identifies several other points of contention that make the AUA study entirely bogus.

  • Not only was the sample group lacking in smoking participants, it was also comprised of an extremely low number of participants overall.
  • The scientists failed to verify whether or not the participants were smoke-free. Instead, they relied on the participants’ answers to verbal surveys, which can be less than accurate.
  • The AUA scientists also measured for the wrong biomarkers – specifically toluidine and-naphthylamine.

Dr. Konstantinos Farsalinos asserts that the AUA failed to disclose in their report that the measurable levels of cancer-causing chemicals like toluidine and-naphthylamine are essentially identical when comparing between smokers and non-smokers. By failing to include this significant fact, the resulting conclusions are intentionally misleading to the average reader.He also alleges that this may be the reason that the article was published as a “conference abstract” rather than a peer-reviewed research paper.

The original AUA report entitled Studies Raise Concerns for the Bladder Cancer Risk of E-Cigarette Smokers and Show Intensity of Traditional Smoking Increases Mortality Rate of Bladder Cancer Patients is readily available for review online. 

View Comments


Scientists at BioReliance: E-cig vapor does not contain carcinogens

Anti-vaping advocates often claim that e-cig vapor is just as toxic with carcinogens as the smoke from combustible cigarettes, but scientists from BioReliance in Rockville, MD, strongly disagree. According to a new vaping study released by the Maryland group, cigarettes contain some 6,000 additional chemicals that are not found in the e-liquids of electronic cigarettes. And of [...]

Read More »


3 scientific studies that will dumbfound the vaping haters

For anyone who has ever attempted to vape in a public place, dealing with the negative attitudes of vaping haters can often be quite embarrassing. The sideways glances and scowling faces are one thing, but the aggressive insults is something entirely different. The next time that someone misquotes the facts about vaping, use these three scientific [...]

Read More »


Is the new FDA Chief Scott Gottlieb pro-vaping?

Depending on where you get your vaping news, some people are pinning all of their hopes and dreams on the shoulders of Scott Gottlieb. As of May 8, he is now the official Head of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the overseer of all things related to the controversial deeming regulations that threaten to [...]

Read More »


Vape study: E-cigs help patients with schizophrenia and severe mental disorders

For physicians specializing in severe mental disorders like schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or chronic depression, helping their patients to quit smoking is traditionally no easy task. People suffering from these types of mood disorders simply have a more difficult time. Doctors avoid a recommendation of quitting “cold turkey” because the resulting withdrawal symptoms can easily trigger increases in symptoms [...]

Read More »


E-cig study: propylene glycol kills airborne bacteria that causes meningitis

A research study has recently resurfaced which indicates that the propylene glycol found in e-cig vapor is shown to kill numerous types of airborne bacteria that can lead to meningitis, pneumonia, impetigo, and even strep throat. Scientific conclusions such as these are seemingly directly contradictory to other previously published reports by public health agencies like the Centers for Disease [...]

Read More »


Failure to launch: Cole-Bishop Amendment dealt crushing blow for vaping

Despite noble efforts from many in the vaping community, the Cole-Bishop Amendment to the FDA deeming regulations has once again failed to gain majority support in Congress. This piece of rider legislation would have moved forward the current predicate date of February 15, 2007 by more than ten years had the approval process been successful. It is this [...]

Read More »


Vaping industry receives 90-day reprieve from FDA deeming regulations

In an unexpected turn of events, the FDA deeming regulations that threaten to bankrupt the American vaping industry by 2018 have just received a 90-day extension. In a letter released last night by Lindsay Tobias from the Center for Tobacco Products, portions of the regulations that relate to the registration of vaping products are being pushed back to November [...]

Read More »


New Study: Soldiers find vaping ‘more satisfying and less dangerous’ than smoking

While the U.S. Navy has recently announced a temporarily vaping ban when onboard ships, a new study by the University of Buffalo indicates that soldiers have a vastly different opinion. To be fair, naval command officials have not ruled out the practice of vaping entirely. They just want more research into the allegations that defective batteries can lead [...]

Read More »


3 Benefits of vaping marijuana instead of smoking it

There are now some 28 different states with some sort of legalized marijuana legislation already in the works, and the vaping industry has proven to be an invaluable ally to the cause. Even though in some circles marijuana is still negatively associated with slow-talking, surfer types like Jeff Spicoli in the 80s flick Fast Times at Ridgemont High, others [...]

Read More »


Sign up for our newsletter

View Cart Go To Checkout